Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Southerngl
The inquest judge is letting Stern's lawyer go to the Supreme Court of the Bahamas to argue that the hearing should be permanently blocked.

It appears that the inquest judge does not carry that much weight in the scheme of things any way. Sort of like a middle man.

14,323 posted on 03/29/2007 5:48:13 PM PDT by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14318 | View Replies ]


To: TexKat
This is not even a trial! IMHO, for Howard K. Stern to go to this extreme to block the hearing into Daniel's death reveals that it was foul play and that Howard has something terrible to hide. Why else bother? An innocent person would have wanted the hearing to be over with and would want justice for Daniel. Not HKS.

I have a difficult time believing that Howard (who was not married to ANS) can block the determination of paternity. He might delay it. But to hide it when there are bound to be leaks? With the development of DNA, this makes no sense. His frantic efforts to hide paternity should be red flags to any honest investigator.

14,334 posted on 03/29/2007 6:02:44 PM PDT by Jane Austen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14323 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson