To: aft_lizard
You are confusing two things, load time and then once its up and running. I think Vista is alot faster once its running, however from boot to completely loaded its start up time is slower than XP.read it, learn it, love it...
Also read anand's review...
To: Echo Talon
No need, I have a XP computer sitting right next to me and it is faster loading. Its stats?
XP computer:
3800+ X2 OC'd to 2.4 ghz(s939)
2 gigs of ram
7900 GT KO GPU
Vista
4600+ X2 at 2.4ghz(sAM2)
2 gigs of Ram
7900 GT KO
73 posted on
02/15/2007 11:52:13 AM PST by
aft_lizard
(born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
To: Echo Talon
No need, I have a XP computer sitting right next to me and it is faster loading. Its stats?
XP computer:
3800+ X2 OC'd to 2.4 ghz(s939)
2 gigs of ram
7900 GT KO GPU
Vista
4600+ X2 at 2.4ghz(sAM2)
2 gigs of Ram
7900 GT KO
74 posted on
02/15/2007 11:53:11 AM PST by
aft_lizard
(born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
To: Echo Talon
I've now got dual boot XP/Ubuntu on my laptop. More and more I am going to Ubuntu.
76 posted on
02/15/2007 11:59:37 AM PST by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Championship U)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson