Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All

The will states:

Except as otherwise stated, I have INTENTIONALLY omitted to provide for my spouse and other heirs, including future spouses and children and other DESCENDANTS NOWLIVING AND THOSE HEREAFTER BORN OR ADOPTED, AS WELL AS EXISTING FUTURE STEPCHILDREN AND FOSTER CHILDREN.

Sounds like Dannielynn isn't an heir, Daniel ONLY.

What kind of lawyer DOESNT' ALLOW HER TO CHANGE HER WILL AFTER DANIEL DIED AND ANOTHER (SUPPOSEDLY HIS) BABY IS BORN.

Howard K. Stern is a quack.


7,621 posted on 02/16/2007 10:41:46 AM PST by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7618 | View Replies ]


To: Southerngl

Holy crap!

Can you say PROBATE? I knew you could!


7,627 posted on 02/16/2007 10:46:15 AM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7621 | View Replies ]

To: Southerngl
Howard K. Stern is a quack

What?

7,632 posted on 02/16/2007 10:47:49 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7621 | View Replies ]

To: Southerngl

So she has excluded her mother, father, siblings and all other heirs except Daniel. It appears to me that she didn't form a inter vivos trust and she knows about those because the old man formed one. She wanted a trust formed when she died. So, the trust does not exist until moment of death. Can you form a trust for a dead person? I don't think so. So I am not sure Daniel's father gets the money. I can't wait to see what the talking law experts have to say tonight.


7,683 posted on 02/16/2007 11:14:00 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7621 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson