Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: A Citizen Reporter

What about this theory? Howard knows about the other child (the Indian one). So he writes up the will disinheriting future/other spouses and children just before that child is born. He tells Anna it's best this way because when Daniel becomes 21 she can will all of her estate over to Daniel and/or he can be executor. No worries about this other kid getting any of the money. After Dannielynn is born, she thinks ah maybe we should change the will now. Howard tells her "why waste time rewriting the will at this point Anna? It's not like you're gonna die before Daniel turns 21". But then Daniel mysteriously dies shy of his 21st b-day. Now Anna's really pressuring Howard to rewrite the will. But he says "first we have to deal with Birkhead. Can't change the will til we're sure Birkhead is out of our hair. He's not after the baby, Anna, he's after the baby's money."

Does this make any sense? Is it clear or unclear? Help me out folks.


24,329 posted on 03/08/2007 5:05:14 PM PST by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24275 | View Replies ]


To: uncitizen
You are quite correct. Anna trusted Daniel to do the right thing no matter what. Remember, she wasn't pregnant at the time, was in love with everyone and Danielynn was not on her mind AT ALL.

I'd like to see the date of the correspondence to Rale to send the will and where it should be sent. That would straighten out the questionable date.

24,342 posted on 03/08/2007 5:13:02 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson