Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Arizona Carolyn

What I'm trying to say-and not very well---is that the ME will not change their findings, just because the police want him to.

When I heard the interview with Perper today on FOX, he said that he was probably not going to change his findings. He said it was possible, but unlikely.


24,098 posted on 03/08/2007 2:33:14 PM PST by sissyjane (Mr. Nifong, you've picked on the wrong families and you will pay for the rest of your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24093 | View Replies ]


To: sissyjane

Who said the police "want" him to change his findings?

What I read was the police had some information (evidence?) that was passed along to Perper. Apparently that they thought might be relevant to his own investigation. And remember, I just told you I heard Perper say he would be interviewing those who had relevant information regarding her condition prior to her death, as part of his investigation.

What if he learned information via the police, or any other source, that contradicted what somebody told him in those interviews, and could possibly change his interpretation or cause him to do further tests?


24,118 posted on 03/08/2007 2:45:23 PM PST by txrangerette (Congressman Duncan Hunter for POTUS...check him out!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24098 | View Replies ]

To: sissyjane
"is that the ME will not change their findings, just because the police want him to."

That is exactly what Wecht was allegeding that Perper is about to do.

24,130 posted on 03/08/2007 2:49:45 PM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24098 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson