Who said the police "want" him to change his findings?
What I read was the police had some information (evidence?) that was passed along to Perper. Apparently that they thought might be relevant to his own investigation. And remember, I just told you I heard Perper say he would be interviewing those who had relevant information regarding her condition prior to her death, as part of his investigation.
What if he learned information via the police, or any other source, that contradicted what somebody told him in those interviews, and could possibly change his interpretation or cause him to do further tests?
Just drop it please. Move on...I've apologized for the confusion.
It has bothered me all along that Perper was to be the only one asking questions, since it had been *assumed* by the Seminole PD (publicly) that there was no foul play involved.