Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gopheraj; All
Maybe he did or maybe ANS did (but them), but just because Daniel is listed as first doesn't mean anything, IMO.

Taken alone it might not mean anything, but in conjunction with all the other krap that went on here, it might be part of the Operation CYA.

Here are some questions for you insurance expert people out there? Is there a dollar value of a policy under which you can have a policy drawn up without a medical test or without the knowledge of the benefactor(Anna)? If so, maybe these policies were under that radar which could lead credence to the theory that Anna didn't know about the policies and would explain why there are 7 smaller policies instead of 1 big one. Another reason could be that it would be less suspicious to the various insurance companies when the claim was filed and maybe not as worthy of investigation. They'd rather pay out than be looked at as not paying out claims. But i don't know if in cases with this much notariety if the various insurance companies would contact one another to see if the others also had a policy on Anna. Especially given the circumstances of her death. Looking for an insurance expert for help here!

21,677 posted on 03/04/2007 9:24:29 AM PST by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21669 | View Replies ]


To: uncitizen
Let's look at someone else for the answer. Are you telling me that these "highly paid sports figures" can't be insured because they do drugs or aren't in ABSOLUTE perfect health.

Anna was fit enough to have a baby and was in good health and obviously, if there are 7 policies, totally insurable. The dates come into play. We normally don't have 7 policies. Maybe one, maybe 2....not in this time rag to riches time frame and not ones that will likely be million dollar policies.

These are DEATH policies. No insurer would GUESS that Anna was gonna die young and not insure her. That's how they make their money....on these large policies where special people get the best of care and their chances of dying are less.

21,683 posted on 03/04/2007 9:38:38 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21677 | View Replies ]

To: uncitizen

I was able to get $100,000 to replace my policy that was coming up for renewal without an exam. $100 thou was all I was able to get here in MO at my age. Insurance companies do a review of some info out there that doctors, hospitals, and other insurance companies post so that you can't lie on a application. I, thankfully, didn't have any doctor visits that precluded me from it. I got it even though I an "hefty". LOLL I believe the younger you are the more (dollarwise) you can get without an exam. Not sure exactly how much and how young, but have seen advertisements on $500,000. I guess the companies that put out the medical info help them to spot frauds. I was also able to get another insurance for hubby and he didn't have any say in it (online) He knows about it, but just let me handle it. No. I am not going to get rid of him. After 39 years I need him to open jars and lift heavy objects. LOLL


21,698 posted on 03/04/2007 9:52:53 AM PST by gopheraj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21677 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson