 |
Anna was getting her advice from HKS, not Ally McBeal . . . |
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 03/09/2007 9:01:03 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
Thread is getting too long for FR servers Please continue here at |
Posted on 02/08/2007 12:39:03 PM PST by kcvl
Anna Nicole Smith collapsed in her hotel room at the Hard Rock Cafe and Casino in Hollywood, Fla., and was rushed to a hospital on Thursday. A Hollywood, Fla., fire department spokesman told MSNBC TV that the actress was unresponsive when the rescue unit arrived on the scene.
Sources confirmed to Access Hollywood that Smith was transported to Memorial Regional Hospital shortly after 2 p.m. EST on Thursday. Access Hollywood also is reporting that Smith was intubated at the scene.
Officials told the Miami Herald, "it does not look good."
She must have seen HKS coming at her --- and just decided to leave the will as is. Maybe she was too drugged out to think about providing for the baby.
And he's known this for quite a while.
Kimmie Walther from her show IS A WITNESS!!!
Looks like we may get to see her dug up for testimony after all.
Did someone write this script?????
Still and all this is a very strange will that HE drafted.
Daniel was a California resident, too.
This is going to get interesting between CA and Florida; I say the Bahamas are out.
|
Anna was getting her advice from HKS, not Ally McBeal . . . |
I'm just blown away.
Kimmie Walther from her show IS A WITNESS!!!
Pardon me, let me clarify. Signed the will as a witness.
Where did you hear that? We haven't heard a peep out of her. I wonder why?
And here is the OTHER WITNESS to her will:
Supreme Court Suspends Los Angeles Lawyer for Failing to Pass MPRE
By ALLISON LOMAs, Staff Writer
A Los Angeles attorney, suspended from practice last year for lying to a client about having lost her case by not filing it on time, has been suspended again, this time for failing to pass the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination.
Kooros James Khavarian, 37, drew two years probation, including 30 days of actual suspension, in July of last year. The Supreme Court stayed Khavarian’s 12-month suspension on the condition that he pass the MPRE within one year.
The court’s Sept. 19 order suspends Khavarian until he passes the MPRE.
The disciplinary action arose out of Khavarian’s treatment of Pamela Burns-Johnson, who brought a claim against the Metropolitan Transportation Authority for back injuries caused by a fall at Union Station.
In a stipulation of facts, Khavarian acknowledged that Burns hired him in August 1995, one year after he was admitted to the bar. Khavarian submitted an unsuccessful claim with the MTA in late December, and then filed the case in Los Angeles Superior Court on Feb. 21, 1996, 10 days after the six-month statute of limitations had run.
He admitted that he never informed his client that the statute of limitations had run.
He also acknowledged that he failed to keep Burns informed of major developments in the case, including the MTA’s motions to compel discovery and seeking summary judgment in July 1996. The MTA moved to compel discovery after Khavarian neglected to communicate Burns’ responses to interrogatories, despite his understanding of the importance of doing so in a timely manner.
The court finally dismissed the case in August 1996 after Khavarian contacted the MTA and agreed to dismiss the action, then signed a request for dismissal with prejudice without Burn’s consent.
Following the dismissal of the case Khavarian sought, according to the stipulated facts, to cease representing Burns without informing her of that fact.
From August 1996 to January 1998, Burns attempted to reach Khavarian who was slow to return her calls, but assured her that the action was still pending. After he ceased to respond to her phone calls completely, Burns inquired at the MTA into the status of her case in mid-1998 and was informed it had been dismissed in 1996.
Khavarian conceded that his attempt to conceal his incompetent legal work and escape a potential malpractice claim by misrepresenting the status of the case constituted an “act involving moral turpitude, dishonesty or corruption.”
Khavarian had not been disciplined by the State Bar prior to his suspension in July 2001. He was represented by JoAnne Earls Robbins of the Los Angeles-based firm Karpman & Associates.
Deputy Chief Trial Counsel Brooke A. Schafer prosecuted the case for the State Bar during the 2001 proceeding.
The cast of clowns continue.
Where is the insurance policy!!
Wow.
I'm befuddled.....she absolutely did exclude any future children. Why in the world would she do that? Did she even realize that she'd done that?
Did you read Article VI?
If anybody tries to contest it, they get NOTHING.
That means if he triest get the money for the baby, he won't get a dime!
I am blown away.
It's really odd Jrabbit. Why didn't HE have her do a new will when Daniel died and she was pregnant??
There may be another will out there yet. And what about the insurance!
However, I can't believe that even ANS would put that in her will. Women just don't do that.
Why would there be trusts if she excluded any future children? We need a devious mind to figure this all out. Legalese gives me hives...
This will is a joke.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.