Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

I'm befuddled.....she absolutely did exclude any future children. Why in the world would she do that? Did she even realize that she'd done that?


7,673 posted on 02/16/2007 11:09:37 AM PST by Jrabbit ('scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7648 | View Replies ]


To: Jrabbit

I am blown away.


7,675 posted on 02/16/2007 11:10:36 AM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7673 | View Replies ]

To: Jrabbit

It's really odd Jrabbit. Why didn't HE have her do a new will when Daniel died and she was pregnant??

There may be another will out there yet. And what about the insurance!


7,676 posted on 02/16/2007 11:11:13 AM PST by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7673 | View Replies ]

To: Jrabbit
Men sometimes make that clause in a will so that any bastard children floating around can't come and claim rights.

However, I can't believe that even ANS would put that in her will. Women just don't do that.

7,677 posted on 02/16/2007 11:11:54 AM PST by Texas_shutterbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7673 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson