Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Calpernia
This is wrong,IMO.Although I've never been a fan of the typical defense lawyer or of "civil liberties" groups I'd support any protest of this that they'd make.

Yes,require DNA samples of those who are convicted of certain types/"levels" of crime (murder,rape,molestation,etc,etc) and those under arrest for certain types of violent crime but not for those arrested for or convicted of certain non-violent crimes.

7 posted on 02/08/2007 7:42:46 AM PST by Gay State Conservative ("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative

>>>Yes,require DNA samples of those who are convicted of certain types/"levels" of crime (murder,rape,molestation,etc,etc) and those under arrest for certain types of violent crime but not for those arrested for or convicted of certain non-violent crimes.

In the UK, they are talking DNA samples for people getting caught doing minor offenses such as climbing trees.


8 posted on 02/08/2007 8:57:46 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson