Not true, amigo. You are the one that posts any half-baked review you can come up with. You and your groupies are uninterested in refutation, which is why I don't provide it. For example, this is demonstrably false:
...there's still no SLI support for any of the Nvidia range.
I've seen SLI configurations on Vista with nVidia cards. I've seen them with ATI cards. I've seen them with one of each.
But really. What difference does it make? You're not interested in the facts. You're interested in casting Vista in a bad light. Mac is an outstanding platform, yet you insist on dwelling on the negative. Odd.
Not true, amigo. You are the one that posts any half-baked review you can come up with. You and your groupies are uninterested in refutation, which is why I don't provide it.
Find a fully "baked" review of Vista and post it... almost every one I've found make similar comments. These are published by major news media and PC journals as well as PC bloggers This particular one comes from CNET... which is often cited as an authoritative source. Your refutation source seems to be "Doohickey says so", ex cathedra and uncheckable. At least you have not posted any links to source material. MrsEmmaPeal provided you with authoritative links from people who put their names and their organizations' reputations on the line with their opinions. Your refutation is to slam the authors of those articles as "lobotomized." By any debate judge's call, that would by argumentum ad hominem.
I've seen SLI configurations on Vista with nVidia cards. I've seen them with ATI cards. I've seen them with one of each.
Well, well. More anecdotal evidence from Doohickey. Were those nVidia and ATI cards working SLI with Vista drivers provided and certified by their manufacturers... or were they hacked drivers downloaded off the net?