Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ml/nj
I did not reject the definition that I cited. I explained how the play fell within it. You're fixating on definitions apart from the rules. We are not talking physics. We're talking football. The impetus was the FUMBLE, not the defensive man swiping at the ball. It is clearly identical to the punt YOU cited. In both cases, the ball was forced backwards by the actions of the defensive team, but possession was last held by the offense. In both cases the ball went out of bounds in the offensive team's end zone, with possession last being held by the offensive side. In both cases the result is a safety.

Why can't you understand such a simple concept?
56 posted on 01/08/2007 9:48:44 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: SoCal Pubbie
Why can't you understand such a simple concept?

Maybe I'm not as simple as you are?

ML/NJ

58 posted on 01/08/2007 9:55:20 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson