In all three lineups the only guy she consistently picked as being at the party (i.e. not a rapist) was out of town. K C J had a good post on this just a couple of days ago.
If that fact alone doesn't weigh heavily with the judge to toss the line-up IDs, I don't know what would. Surely he will move to dismiss this case based on lack of evidence to move it forward, don't you think?
I'd appreciate a link if you can find it.