Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Zionist Conspirator
"You know, I've always wondered about toilet facilities in Jerusalem in the days of the Temple. Since Jerusalem represented Machane-Yisra'el (the encampment of Israel), did one have to leave the city every time one needed to relieve himself? I mean, they didn't have modern sewage facilities back then and . . .

. . . Am I making any sense, people?
"

Yes. My best guess is that they had toilet facilities outside of their blocks. Dwellings were often built into close, modular clusters then and there.
22 posted on 01/04/2007 2:28:17 PM PST by familyop ("G-d is on our side because he hates the Yanks." --St. Tuco, in the "Good, the Bad, and the Ugly")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: familyop
Yes. My best guess is that they had toilet facilities outside of their blocks. Dwellings were often built into close, modular clusters then and there.

That might apply to any other ancient city, but my question regarding Jerusalem was predicated precisely on its unique status as Machane-Yisra'el. I'm guessing that in the wanderings in the Midbar people had to leave the camp to releave themselves, and since Jerusalem inherited the status of "the Encampment of Israel" then it would have inherited all the stringencies that went along with it.

23 posted on 01/04/2007 2:32:47 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator ( Chazaq! Chazaq!! Venitchazzeq!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson