Posted on 01/02/2007 10:03:56 PM PST by Coleus
Just like the Flt 800 investigation, can't trust pilots to tell the truth. /s
I'm fine with them being skeptical, even dismissive.
I don't like when they start insulting witnesses. Like you said, especially certain professionals.
I actually know one of the people that witnessed it and they are unsure of what they saw and think the government is being a little too quick in what they say.
This person is very put together.
Anyone else notice the date of the sighting? Election day! perhaps that's where Stroger's people took all of Pereica's votes (very suspicious county board president election).
I think they saw the spaceship disguised as a football stadium on our lakefront and were scared off.
Well, ya know, you can't expect a bunch of guys who stare at flying things all day to tell swamp gas when they see it...
There oughta be a citizens committee that can flat out summarily fire the idiot from the FAA who would even come up with this one in his sleep.
This one is sounding more and more like the real McCoy.
The Mothership is looking for Al Gore....PHONE HOME AL!!!
UFOs are real. I know because I ran into a little pink fairy spreading fairy dust on a group of people and all those people within days (or is it daze) were all seeing UFOs. I swear this is true.
Magic words of poof poof piffles, make me just as small as Sniffles.
Interesting, and about what I'd expect. If you've never seen anything unidentified like this before, it can be quite an emotional experience, reducing one's ability to logically comprehend what is exactly taking place.
the government is being a little too quick in what they say.
If it's true they have no radar data indicating anything abnormal, and this supposed picture that exists on UFO sites is still being hidden from analysis or doesn't actually even exist, what else is there to do? Polygraphs? What would that proove? Your own contact is "unsure" of what they saw, correct? Others may "feel sure", but still be mistaken.
That would seem logical, however case studies seem to indicate pilots etc typically jump to incorrect conclusions under the assumption anything appearing to be flying must be physically designed for flight.
Case Studies In Pilot Misperceptions Of "UFOs"
http://www.zip.com.au/~psmith/pilot-ufos.html
And a thread about UFO's over O'Hare airport raises the level of discourse?
Tell you what pal, send your comment to the mods, let them decide.
See post number 13.
See post number 13.
WHAT? THE WEIRD WEATHER IS DUE TO UFOS???
The absence of radar data doesn't really say much anymore. I've been reading about some of the experiments they are doing in defense labs with light bending to produce invisibility.
Our obsolete stealth technology reduces the radar cross section of a bomber to that of a seagull.
Radar works at airfields for what we want it to do, which is track heavy passenger aircraft.
It's funny, because in places like Russia, Mexico, Norway, China, and Japan, there isn't even a debate about the existence of UFO's. Plenty about what they might be, but zero about the fact they exist.
The FAA. That's an agency with credibility.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.