To: SmithL
Mr. Olive should've been carrying a .45 ;-)
2 posted on
12/21/2006 1:06:49 PM PST by
300magnum
(We know that if evil is not confronted, it gains in strength and audacity, and returns to strike us)
To: 300magnum
Mr. Olive should've been carrying a .45 ;-)
Or, aimed for the torso.
3 posted on
12/21/2006 1:08:54 PM PST by
Spruce
To: 300magnum
AMEN to that!
Also, they should just keep the kid in jail for the robbery until he begs them to remove the bullet, then they just retrieve it and take it to the grand jury for an attempted murder charge.
5 posted on
12/21/2006 1:13:33 PM PST by
TheKidster
(you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
To: 300magnum
Yeah, but the gov't shouldn't be able to force someone to submit to surgery. I'd like to see the kid rot in jail if he's guilty, but this would seem like a violation of the 5th amendment, of sorts.
6 posted on
12/21/2006 1:15:55 PM PST by
Fierce Allegiance
(Merry Christmas! SAY NO TO RUDY!)
To: 300magnum
Mr. Olive should've been carrying a .45 ;-)
I'm ashamed to say that that was almost my first thought. "If he'd been using a .45 ACP...."
I don't see the warrant as unreasonable. They have good cause to believe the bullet is buried in his forehead and that it may be critical evidence in a trial.
11 posted on
12/21/2006 1:18:49 PM PST by
JamesP81
(If you have to ask permission from Uncle Sam, then it's not a right)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson