Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: threeleftsmakearight
So now rumor is "News"? No wonder the Conservatives cannot win anything. They have become utterly PR stupid.
2 posted on
12/04/2006 9:26:41 AM PST by
MNJohnnie
(I do not forgive Senator John McCain for helping destroy everything we built since 1980.)
To: threeleftsmakearight
To: threeleftsmakearight
Wanna know who I'd nominate?
Ted Nugent.
4 posted on
12/04/2006 9:26:51 AM PST by
RockinRight
(Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. That's his name, and words mean things. Think about it.)
To: threeleftsmakearight
Don't scare me like that. At first glance I thought it said "George Michael."
To: threeleftsmakearight
What a freaking insult to John Bolton to even consider his shoes small enough for Mitchell to wear...
6 posted on
12/04/2006 9:27:54 AM PST by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
To: threeleftsmakearight
George Mitchell the former lib Senator or the Texas billionaire?
8 posted on
12/04/2006 9:28:04 AM PST by
RockinRight
(Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. That's his name, and words mean things. Think about it.)
To: threeleftsmakearight
Drudge doesn't have any link to back this up
15 posted on
12/04/2006 9:29:33 AM PST by
Mo1
(Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
To: threeleftsmakearight
Why not nominate a woman this time? It might make it harder for the Dems to filibuster her nomination.
16 posted on
12/04/2006 9:29:43 AM PST by
Ciexyz
(Satisfied owner of a 2007 Toyota Corolla.)
To: threeleftsmakearight
The MSM not only chooses our presidenbtail candidates for us, but they also chose our U.N. ambassadors for us.
Isn't that special.
To: threeleftsmakearight
Throwing in the towel wouldn't even begin to describe this decision...
19 posted on
12/04/2006 9:30:08 AM PST by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: threeleftsmakearight
George Mitchell, as in the chairman of Disney?
22 posted on
12/04/2006 9:30:58 AM PST by
jpl
(Victorious warriors win first, then go to war; defeated warriors go to war first, then seek to win.)
To: threeleftsmakearight
And Bush will do it, but wtf who cares.
26 posted on
12/04/2006 9:31:37 AM PST by
boomop1
(there you go again)
To: threeleftsmakearight
And Bush will do it, but wtf who cares.
27 posted on
12/04/2006 9:31:39 AM PST by
boomop1
(there you go again)
To: threeleftsmakearight
This has to be BS. Mitchell would never accept - he's a dour partisan DemonRat - he's as partisan as they come even though the MSM would never call him on it.
I don't think he hates America as much as the current crop of congressional Democrats, but I don't think he's going to do anything related to the Bush admin.
To: threeleftsmakearight
They have GOT to be kidding!
33 posted on
12/04/2006 9:32:26 AM PST by
kalee
(II have taken the pledge... I will no longer read homeschooling or breastfeeding threads on FR.)
To: threeleftsmakearight
If Dubya has to give the libs something to get something in return, UN Ambassador might as well be it.
But, if the libs are smart, a lib UN Ambassador will get Dubya the privilege of nominating a conservative for DC dog catcher.
To: threeleftsmakearight
37 posted on
12/04/2006 9:33:16 AM PST by
WalterSkinner
( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
To: threeleftsmakearight
WOW, another bash bush thread, what a suprise!
To: threeleftsmakearight
I think he should have appointed Bill Clinton, and at least get him off the streets.
41 posted on
12/04/2006 9:34:50 AM PST by
TommyDale
(Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
To: threeleftsmakearight
Being on a short list doesn't mean a g-d thing. THey put names on short lists all the time that no one ever has any intention of choosing.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
