Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse
" You seem to be missing the part where the kid brought about his own demise with his actions."

He did not bring about his own demise. He was murdered! He was murdered to satisfy the blood lust of a murderer!

" If he hadn't been committing a CRIME, his intended VICTIM wouldn't have chased him down and ended his worthless life."

His life was not worthless! His life was taken in an unjustifiable murder. His crime was nothing in comparison. It was simply a negligent act perpetrated by a minor. The murderer had no justification whatsoever for the vicious killing. He's not entitled to revenge in any way, legally, or morally.

"Sorry if you don't like that, but face up to the fact that the kid started this crap."

I don't believe you're sorry in any way. You've been excusing murder and condoning it for the slighest infraction of the law.

"Would we decry the actions of a sleeping bear if this kid had egged the bear, woken it up, and then been eaten? Then why so here?"

An animal can't be a murderer. Are people animals to you?

"Do something criminal, pay the consequences, serve as a lesson to others to not be a criminal."

Since you have no respect for the letter of the law, or the spirit of it, your argument is vacuous and it appears you are simply speaking as an animal.

206 posted on 12/03/2006 2:06:08 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets

What is the root cause of the kid's death?

Trace it back .... to the first volitional action that would have changed the outcome.


209 posted on 12/03/2006 2:20:22 PM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

To: spunkets
He did not bring about his own demise.

Ah... so he wasn't out assaulting others? Or did you miss that part?

His life was not worthless!

Really? You knew him that well? Or was this behavior a sign of things to come? If he's out at 12:30 AM throwing objects at moving cars, then just maybe this is the type of person we'd end up having to incarcerate after he'd raped/murdered someone later on... Negligence implies he was carelessly tossing eggs around instead of specifically targeting an actual victim.

You've been excusing murder and condoning it for the slighest infraction of the law.

Screw the law. He violated the equal Rights of another. Did his victim ask to have his vehicle attacked? That was the initial act that lead to his death. Without it, the kid would still be alive.

Since you have no respect for the letter of the law, or the spirit of it, your argument is vacuous and it appears you are simply speaking as an animal.

The "spirit" of any law in the US was to be the equal protection of all of our rights. Including not being attacked after midnight by some punk. Only a "liberal" would excuse the actions of the initiating criminal.

237 posted on 12/03/2006 6:28:07 PM PST by Dead Corpse (Anyone who needs to be persuaded to be free, doesn't deserve to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson