Ah... so he wasn't out assaulting others? Or did you miss that part?
His life was not worthless!
Really? You knew him that well? Or was this behavior a sign of things to come? If he's out at 12:30 AM throwing objects at moving cars, then just maybe this is the type of person we'd end up having to incarcerate after he'd raped/murdered someone later on... Negligence implies he was carelessly tossing eggs around instead of specifically targeting an actual victim.
You've been excusing murder and condoning it for the slighest infraction of the law.
Screw the law. He violated the equal Rights of another. Did his victim ask to have his vehicle attacked? That was the initial act that lead to his death. Without it, the kid would still be alive.
Since you have no respect for the letter of the law, or the spirit of it, your argument is vacuous and it appears you are simply speaking as an animal.
The "spirit" of any law in the US was to be the equal protection of all of our rights. Including not being attacked after midnight by some punk. Only a "liberal" would excuse the actions of the initiating criminal.
The object was an egg.
" Screw the law. He violated the equal Rights of another."
Obtuse. He was murdered by a vicious killer who violated his right to life, w/o justification.
"That was the initial act that lead to his death."
The death was a premeditated act of murder. Tossing the egg is irrelevant. Nothing justifies the murder. " The "spirit" of any law in the US was to be the equal protection of all of our rights."
Equal protection means the law applies to all, not that any rights violation justifies a vicious murder.