[Neverforget01]

Cash pulled a similar stunt on the abc11 boards. He'd come on, never giving an opinion on whether or not a rape took place, but claiming to just want to protect the accuser. Then when the whole case blows up he can say he "never said they were guilty." I think he's just trying to make himself relevant somehow.

I'm not quite sure what balance means to Mr. Michaels. I'm all for balanced reports but when the only balance is: the boys were underage drinkers and the DA must have something, I'm not quite sure Mr. Bradley would have wanted to look so foolish. I do find it humorous to watch Mr. Michaels turn on Ms. Roberts. I guess that "sister" isn't worthy of defending.

[Locomotive Breath]

Well, as others have said, I think 60 Minutes did the right thing by keep the focus on whether a crime was committed.

Mangum's prior behavior, Kim's prior behavior, and the lax team's prior behavior is completely irrelevant. All that matters is what those people did on that night (and in Mangum's case, in the time since). Anyone who wants to make it more than that is promoting using this to promote their own agenda.