Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Neverforget01

Well, as others have said, I think 60 Minutes did the right thing by keep the focus on whether a crime was committed.

Mangum's prior behavior, Kim's prior behavior, and the lax team's prior behavior is completely irrelevant. All that matters is what those people did on that night (and in Mangum's case, in the time since). Anyone who wants to make it more than that is promoting using this to promote their own agenda.


92 posted on 10/19/2006 12:42:01 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Locomotive Breath

"is promoting using this to promote their own agenda"

should be

"is using this to promote their own agenda"


93 posted on 10/19/2006 12:43:28 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Locomotive Breath
I agree with you 100%. For an oral, viginal and anal rape to have been committed there must be some physical evidence and the accuser's story should be consistent and her identifications irrefutable. Anything else leads to reasonable doubts and acquittals. The fact that Nifong brought this case without evidence of rape is beyond my comprehension.

I honestly believe he mislead the Grand Jury with a hyped up medical report knowing how sexually active CGM was. If he didn't know, he should have investigated before going to the Grand Jury...What DA presents a rape case without knowing where else and with whom else the accuser was on the night in question?

/rant

94 posted on 10/19/2006 12:52:17 PM PDT by Neverforget01 (Republicans resign; Democrats run for reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Locomotive Breath

Exactly! CBS focused on THE isssue. Whether or not a crime was committed. Really whether or not there was any evidence that a crime was committed and if so did these defendants commit said crime.

It seems they concluded the answer was there is not enough evidence to even conclude a crime was committed, so they focused more on that but the player interviews did focus on the fact that had a crime been commited Finnerty and Seligmann could not have committed it.

Cash Michaels on the other hand is like the N&O and the Herald to afraid of local opinion to follow the evidence. Too bad Michaels does not have the stones of Ed Bradley or Jason Whitlock, but then that is probably why he is a local columnist in a racial oriented publication and Bradley and Whitlock are in broader markets. Often times not having the stones to face reality keep one from the big time.


96 posted on 10/19/2006 1:07:51 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Locomotive Breath
"Mangum's prior behavior, Kim's prior behavior, and the lax team's prior behavior is completely irrelevant. All that matters is what those people did on that night (and in Mangum's case, in the time since). Anyone who wants to make it more than that is promoting using this to promote their own agenda."

This can't be stressed enough IMO.

159 posted on 10/19/2006 9:50:36 PM PDT by VRWCtaz ("Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness." - Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson