Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Locomotive Breath

Feinstein is probably too hard left to either offer an opinion on this OR to be fair on this allegation.

Abrams is not a reporter anymore. He might well not have wanted to involve himself such a panel because of his new position.


443 posted on 10/23/2006 9:04:35 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies ]


To: JLS
True enough. But his position was unique. He was one of the first, if not the first, to realize that we'd "been had". Of the people on the panel, he's also the first to have seen the first discovery in its entirety. You're right that he might have plenty of reasons for not wanting to attend. And let's face it, at the time, he was in the same line of work as Nancy Grace and Greta van Susteren. Those are not people with whom I'd like to be lumped. Perhaps he's not considered to be part of the "respectable" media.
445 posted on 10/23/2006 9:24:32 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies ]

To: JLS

Abrahms is still a reporter. He's still NBC's chief legal correspondent. I'm sure he's busy but I wish he had been there.


453 posted on 10/23/2006 1:13:48 PM PDT by SarahUSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson