Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Pittman's comments appeared to carry little weight with roundtable participants. "She seemed very sincere, but just like everyone who is not one of the accused or the accuser, she has limited access to the truth," Troy said.

Troy is a PC idiot... But Kim is still lying and still can't get her stories straight...

740 posted on 10/16/2006 2:21:55 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 729 | View Replies ]


To: darbymcgill

Reducing this case to its bare essentials, it appears that the only items of evidence supporting the AV's rape claim are the following.

1. The AV and the defendants were present at the house that evening for at least a few minutes simultaneously.
2. The medical exam of the AV indicated that the AV recently had sex.

Leaving aside all of the exculpatory evidence, does applicable law allow for trial and possible conviction based on nothing more than the AV's accusation and the above evidence?

If so, it seems the law should be changed.

If not, then the defendants should be able to get the case dismissed.


743 posted on 10/16/2006 3:50:34 AM PDT by JBird77777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 740 | View Replies ]

To: darbymcgill
What was she lying about? She even admitted she was the first one to use racial slur. And they were apart two times, it's obvious from her police report.
First time when Kim left to the car but Precious stayed in the house. And second time when Precious went back to the house to get her shoe, although I don't think she ever made it inside.
747 posted on 10/16/2006 4:12:19 AM PDT by jennyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 740 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson