http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/16/earlyshow/main2090285.shtml
Sherman: '60' Interview Good For Accused
CBS Legal Analyst Mickey Sherman Says '60 Minutes' Interview Probably Helped Accused
Look at the comments. I still can't get over the people who cling to the belief that "the DA must have something" and can't get their minds around the fact that ALL evidence is in the hands of the defense and that the defense has shown it ALL to numerous news organizations including Ed B. (If my two experiences as an expert witness are any indication, discovery comes page numbered and indexed so it's easy to tell that if anything's missing.) If Mike Nifong still "has something" he's breaking the law.
Let's underscore the fact that, except for RS's alibi and the time-stamped photos, 60 Minutes used the PROSECUTION'S evidence for the story. We've not seen most of the DEFENSE evidence. If it looks this one-sided against the prosecution using their own evidence, what will it look like when we add in the defense evidence?