Look at the comments. I still can't get over the people who cling to the belief that "the DA must have something" and can't get their minds around the fact that ALL evidence is in the hands of the defense and that the defense has shown it ALL to numerous news organizations including Ed B. (If my two experiences as an expert witness are any indication, discovery comes page numbered and indexed so it's easy to tell that if anything's missing.) If Mike Nifong still "has something" he's breaking the law.
Let's underscore the fact that, except for RS's alibi and the time-stamped photos, 60 Minutes used the PROSECUTION'S evidence for the story. We've not seen most of the DEFENSE evidence. If it looks this one-sided against the prosecution using their own evidence, what will it look like when we add in the defense evidence?
Hey LB, first, I agree with you. For a little irritation read down in the comments on John in Carolina's blog 60 min hoax story-first take from Sunday night. It's amazing the convoluted logic that shows up. He/she contends that the video of CGM was fake--wrong complexion, etc. That no one touched why the boys left the house so fast after the party, and that the whole interview was the defense's material. That last may be true since Nifong has no evidence.
I don't think the 60 min story was terrific. There is almost no way to make it good because there is just too much information to get out in the time they had. I sort of like the angle though, they stuck to prosecutorial misconduct and didn't get into all the personal reasons why CGM is most likely a liar. I do hope we see more of Brodhead though--I like watching him squirm.