Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vista Licenses Limit OS Transfers, Ban VM Use
TechWeb ^ | October 12, 2006 (1:53 PM EDT) | Gregg Keizer

Posted on 10/13/2006 7:22:58 AM PDT by Señor Zorro

Microsoft has released licenses for the Windows Vista operating system that dramatically differ from those for Windows XP in that they limit the number of times that retail editions can be transferred to another device and ban the two least-expensive versions from running in a virtual machine.

The new licenses, which were highlighted by the Vista team on its official blog Tuesday, add new restrictions to how and where Windows can be used.

"The first user of the software may reassign the license to another device one time. If you reassign the license, that other device becomes the "licensed device," reads the license for Windows Vista Home Basic, Home Premium, Ultimate, and Business. In other words, once a retail copy of Vista is installed on a PC, it can be moved to another system only once.

The new policy is narrower than Windows XP's. In the same section, the license for Windows XP Home states: "You may move the Software to a different Workstation Computer. After the transfer, you must completely remove the Software from the former Workstation Computer." There is no limit to the number of times users can make this move. Windows XP Professional's license is identical.

Elsewhere in the license, Microsoft forbids users from installing Vista Home Basic and Vista Home Premium in a virtual machine. "You may not use the software installed on the licensed device within a virtual (or otherwise emulated) hardware system," the legal language reads. Vista Ultimate and Vista Business, however, can be installed within a VM.

Vista Home Basic, at $199 for a full version and $99 for an upgrade, and Vista Home Premium ($239/$159), are the two most-affordable retail editions of the operating system scheduled to appear on store shelves in January 2007.

Although the Vista team's blog did not point out these changes, it did highlight others. "Two notable changes between Windows Vista license terms and those for Windows XP are: 1) failure of a validation check results in the loss of access to specific features; and 2) an increase in our warranty period from 90 days to 1 year, which brings Windows in line with most other Microsoft products," wrote Vista program manager Nick White.

Specifically, the Vista license calls out the ramifications of a failed validation check of Vista.

"The software will from time to time validate the software, update or require download of the validation feature of the software," it reads. "If after a validation check, the software is found not to be properly licensed, the functionality of the software may be affected."

Vista's new anti-piracy technologies, collectively dubbed "Software Protection Platform," have met with skepticism by analysts and criticism by users. Under the new program, a copy of Vista that's judged to be in violation of its license, or is counterfeit, is disabled after a set period, leaving the user access only to the default Web browser, and then only for an hour at a time.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: lowqualitycrap; microsoft; vista
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-388 next last
To: dcam

lol....I've always assumed that anyone who writes "M$" or "Micro$oft" doesn't really know what they're talking about when it comes to computers. I've never been proved wrong, either.


61 posted on 10/13/2006 9:36:12 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ark_girl

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEJIZgfZplo


62 posted on 10/13/2006 9:37:11 AM PDT by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dcam

"When will you folks learn that using M$ only shows your socialist bias?"

Oh grow up. This has nothing to do with socialism.


63 posted on 10/13/2006 9:37:17 AM PDT by DonaldC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Babu
A few questions come to mind:

How geeky does one have to be to learn to use Linux?

Simple distros like Suse and Ubuntu are little more difficult than MacOSX. You shouldn't have to hit the command line to do anything.

Do you buy or build your own machine for it

Either. A machine that is a year or two old is actually best, since all the hardware should be supported natively. It can take some time for new hardware to be supported out of the box.

, and where do you get the software?

In most distros, there are software repositories. Ubuntu uses a program called "synaptic" to manage the software. You simply select a program from a list and click install. There are a few difficult areas -- primarily proprietary video codecs and DVD playback. The software is out there, but not officially supported.

Is it hard to learn to use?

If you can learn Windows or OSX, you can learn Linux. There are good books and helpful websites. Ubuntu has great forums for technical assistance.

Can you use Windows Office, Quicken, Adobe Photoshop, Palm Desktop software, browse the Internet, .. and other commonly used software on Linux-based machines (for example, my wife takes college courses part time and must use Power Point)?

If you REALLY NEED Microsoft office, you can run it under wine or Crossover office. There are Linux programs that do all the office functionality, including OpenOffice (which includes word processing, spreadsheets and powerpoint compatible software), GNUcash (for finance), GIMP (image editing), Evolution (Outlook -- it also supports Palm devices). They have their strengths and weaknesses. If you use the really advanced features of some of the Windows programs, you may be let down. Otherwise they are good programs.

And of course, I presume you can browse the Internet using Linux, download, etc.?

Firefox runs on Linux -- it's included in almost every distro. The Internet is really Linux's desktop strength.

64 posted on 10/13/2006 9:39:30 AM PDT by MediaMole (9/11 - We have already forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

Office 2007 is pretty impressive


65 posted on 10/13/2006 9:39:33 AM PDT by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: fhlh
don't worry... it'll be circumvented by smarter programmers than the clowns at MS.

In other words, criminals.

66 posted on 10/13/2006 9:39:46 AM PDT by Protagoras (Billy only tried to kill Bin Laden, he actually succeeded with Ron Brown and Vince Foster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething
I need a basic understanding of optional systems like Linux, etc. Is it an OS like Windows? Desktop, etc? DO I just do a clean build and install it instead of Windows?

Linux is a derivative form of the original System V UNIX (SVR4), which was pioneered by Bell Labs and spread from there. The Linux kernel was authored by Linus Torvalds (hence the name "Linux").

Right now there are over 100 variants of SVR4- and BSD-style Unix. Some are incredibly user-friendly and others require a higher skill set to maintain. Red Hat and Debian rank as the more user-friendly editions of Linux and can be found at most computer superstores like Fry's, Best Buy, et al. There is also Linspire (formerly "Lindows") which touts itself as the easiest-to-use Desktop Linux.

Linux graphical user interfaces (GUIs) are a lot like Windows, only much more stable. And yes, you can even emulate the Windows environment on a Linux system using any number of software emulators like WINE or Win4Lin.

As for how to install, you can either scrub your system and load Linux exclusively, or you can use a product like System Commander to have dual-boot capabilities; keeping both OS's on one computer.

Hope this helps.

67 posted on 10/13/2006 9:40:27 AM PDT by Prime Choice (True Conservatives don't vote for Liberals just because they have an 'R' by their name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

What do u mean no cd copying and no dvd backups?


68 posted on 10/13/2006 9:41:18 AM PDT by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
In other words, criminals.

Yup...thanks to the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA), it is now a crime to make a monkey out of slothful corporations.

69 posted on 10/13/2006 9:42:42 AM PDT by Prime Choice (True Conservatives don't vote for Liberals just because they have an 'R' by their name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

You see this?


70 posted on 10/13/2006 9:43:21 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poindexters brother
I am a computer professional and I am hard-pressed to understand any compelling reason for anyone to move from WinXP to Vista - other than strong-arm tactics from MS.

Microsoft understands this and, quite frankly, doesn't care. They know that when the average consumer buys a new system, they'll take whatever OEM OS and software is bundled with it. That is how Microsoft corners the market and that is how they assure their anti-competitive practices will remain intact.

Windows Vista will make it into your home. The only variable in the equation is when. And you can bet that it will precisely coincide with your next PC purchase. Microsoft has seen to that.

71 posted on 10/13/2006 9:45:06 AM PDT by Prime Choice (True Conservatives don't vote for Liberals just because they have an 'R' by their name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Señor Zorro

Microsoft must really WANT to lose its place to Linux. I worked with a Linux X-Windows box and used open office - it was a pretty darn good interface. Any windows users should be able to get comfy in short order.


72 posted on 10/13/2006 9:45:55 AM PDT by Little Ray (If you want to be a martyr, we want to martyr you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407
Why should I have to get power locks and power windows just because I want air conditioning and automatic transmission?

Well, sticking to the auto analogy, back in the '80s, Honda offered their Accord (iirc) in a total of six (6), that's right, six configurations.

GM's Buick division offered a model available in over 30,000 configurations.

Which company isn't having problems?

What's easier to build, or in the OS world, support?

73 posted on 10/13/2006 9:48:01 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
I've always assumed that anyone who writes "M$" or "Micro$oft" doesn't really know what they're talking about when it comes to computers. I've never been proved wrong, either.

Surprise, bunny. Here's the exception to your rule.

74 posted on 10/13/2006 9:48:28 AM PDT by Prime Choice (True Conservatives don't vote for Liberals just because they have an 'R' by their name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

For all the bluster from the mac crowd about microsoft, apple still has like 3-4% of the market and microsoft 90%.


75 posted on 10/13/2006 9:48:56 AM PDT by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Please recomment a fast linux that can run on older (p2/p3 256m ram) hardware. I'd love to move my webserver over to a linux box. But ever time I've tried linux it was just to damn slow to be useable.

Oh, that's easy. I wrote a tutorial on the subject years ago.

Linux on an eMachines 600is.

76 posted on 10/13/2006 9:51:26 AM PDT by Prime Choice (True Conservatives don't vote for Liberals just because they have an 'R' by their name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SDGOP
apple still has like 3-4% of the market and microsoft 90%.

What's your point? Bigger is better? You must be in hog heaven, then. Microsoft is really getting huge.

77 posted on 10/13/2006 9:54:18 AM PDT by Glenn (Annoy a BushBot...Think for yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
If it comes down to it, I just won't upgrade to Vista, and if I buy a new machine I'll downgrade to XP.

Yeah, I've thought about that, since I find XP adequate to my needs. But you know M-soft will cease to support XP at some point after Vista comes out (yes, I understand one may can run XP w/out support, but isn't it possible due to hacks and viruses that fixes might be needed at some point?)

78 posted on 10/13/2006 9:56:55 AM PDT by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
thanks for all the info. but i still would like to know if these other OS can be used to play games like GOTHIC or Morrowind in other words window based games

thanks
79 posted on 10/13/2006 9:57:58 AM PDT by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Windows Vista will make it into your home. The only variable in the equation is when. And you can bet that it will precisely coincide with your next PC purchase. Microsoft has seen to that.

Except that I don't buy PCs, I build my own.

80 posted on 10/13/2006 9:58:21 AM PDT by poindexters brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-388 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson