Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jezebelle
That testimony you recited is frightening because it indicates to me that she was cooperating with Liefong at that point.

I made that up... As far as I know Kim and Nifong have never talked...

Also as far as I know the only statement Kim gave to the cops about the "rape / sexual assault" was on the 20th

SHE STATED THAT SHE HEARD THAT MS. MANGUM WAS SEXUALLY ASSAULTED, WHICH SHE STATED IS A “CROCK” AND SHE STATED THAT SHE WAS WITH HER THE WHOLE TIME UNTIL SHE LEFT

The only things she says in her written statement in my opinion are lists of events that the cops wanted entered. She even left one out that reflected negatively on the boys version and had to go back and add it almost 2 hours after she finished her original statment.

the AV arrives a 11:30 (fits cops theory, but wrong)

they were given drinks (fits date rape drug, but later she says she doesn't know if the AV drank more than a sip)

the broom comment (broom rape was a cop theory early, but wrong)


here's a part I think she changed
I left the alone bathroom with my dancing gear on. I changed my clothes in the car. Some of the boys came by wanting to talk to me. I was told by one of the guys Precious was passed out in the backyard. Within minutes she was helped out of the backyard and into my car.
That statement of events we know would have taken considerably longer than 5 minutes. She and the AV went to the BR at 12:05. The AV made a phone call at 12:26, is shown on the back porch alone at 12:30 and being put in the car at 12:41.

Kim's written statement leaves the impression that she didn't see the AV from the time she (Kim) left the bath room until the boys dragged her to the car at 12:41. That's a 20 - 30 minute gap where she didn't see the AV.

Finally Kim says she goes back to get the AV's stuff. And retraces her steps along the side of the house to the back porch. (fits the cops theory that the AV's stuff wasn't in the back yard or she would have seen it. no other reason to make the amendment 2 hours later)

So, in my opinion, Kim was just writing down what the cops wanted her to write down.

532 posted on 10/14/2006 3:44:27 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies ]


To: darbymcgill

If she was writing down what the cops wanted her to write down, her story would comport with Mangum's and there would be no "crock" statement.

Anyway, I don't appreciate you making stuff up. Maybe you find it amusing, but when I reply to somebody I tell the truth as I understand it and don't try to make my point through lies.

We don't know what time im said she left the bathroom or if she was there when Mangum made her phone call. Kim said that when Mangum was put in the car, she wanted to go back in because there was more money to be made. That's pretty damning, and not something the cops woulod want her to write down.

Anyway, I don't appreciate your methods of discussion, so I think this is over, as well as any future discussions between us. But thanks for letting me know that exchange with Liefong was all BS. Now I'm not worried anymore about Kim's testimony.

See ya'.


535 posted on 10/14/2006 4:25:09 AM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies ]

To: darbymcgill
No. I think she was being as truthful as it is possible for her to be at that time.
While not all in her report might be the truth, I do not think police told her to write anything, or her story would have matched with Precious on how they were separated by 6 men, and it does not.
537 posted on 10/14/2006 4:27:41 AM PDT by jennyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson