[snip]
Neither Durham Mayor Bill Bell nor City Manager Patrick Baker was interviewed for the television investigative report.
Baker said he will be interested to see what new details the show brings to light, but he doesn't believe the Durham Police Department's work on the case should be second-guessed if new statements contradict previous ones.
"If the dancer says one thing to our officers and another to '60 Minutes,' it raises questions about her credibility and the credibility of the entire case," Baker said.
"The Police Department is at the whim of the evidence given to them. ... If people have given the Durham Police Department the wrong information, it's certainly going to affect the DA's ability to prosecute the case."
But, he cautioned, "Keep in mind these men were indicted by a grand jury. ... It wouldn't be the first time an indictment has occurred based on information that is later proven to be false.
I think justice needs to be served. I don't want anyone to go through indictments when they're innocent. If the witness or the victim is not telling the truth, that's going to come out."
Sunday's broadcast will differ from most "60 Minutes" presentations in that two out of three segments will deal with the Duke lacrosse case. Normally, each segment is on a different topic.
Chalmers AWOL again?
Baker's bailing on Liefong and pinning the blame on Mangum and Roberts.
When they start pointing fingers at each other, listen carefully for the first rasp of the death rattle.
Baker is certainly retreating with his statements in this Herald Sun article. Of course how is "crock" different than what Pittman [aka Roberts] said on the 60 Minutes tease?