Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'60 Minutes' interviews Duke lacrosse defendants (DukeLax Ping)
Durham Herald-Sun ^ | October 11, 2006 | John Stevenson

Posted on 10/11/2006 1:52:56 AM PDT by abb

DURHAM -- A CBS "60 Minutes" segment on the controversial Duke University lacrosse rape case is expected to air Sunday evening and will include interviews with all three indicted players and Kim Roberts Pittman, the second dancer at the party where the attack allegedly occurred.

CBS would not comment on the show. The network's normal practice is to withhold information about "60 Minutes" broadcasts until a few days in advance.

But Pittman's lawyer, Mark Simeon of Durham, confirmed Tuesday that his client was interviewed. But Simeon ended a telephone conversation before fielding a question about what Pittman told the interviewer.

An exotic dancer at the time, Pittman was with another dancer who claimed she was raped and sodomized by three lacrosse players during an off-campus party at 610 N. Buchanan Blvd. in mid-March.

Pittman since has been quoted as saying the rape charges were "a crock." She also told police in a March 22 handwritten statement that she and the accuser ended their performance when someone at the lacrosse party "brought out a broomstick and ... said he would use the broomstick on us."

"That statement made me uncomfortable and I felt like I wanted to leave," Pittman added. "I raised my voice to the boys and said the show was over."

Pittman said she then asked the alleged rape victim to leave the party with her. But she said the accuser "felt we could get more money and that we shouldn't leave yet."

According to Pittman, the accuser "began showing signs of intoxication" early in the dance performance and was "basically out of it" by the time it ended.

Pittman finally drove the other dancer to a Hillsborough Road grocery store, from which a 911 call was placed to police.

There is nothing about an alleged rape in Pittman's written statement, which is included in public-record court files.

All three defendants also were interviewed for the "60 Minutes" segment, sources told The Herald-Sun. The interviewer is veteran reporter Ed Bradley.

The three -- Collin Finnerty, Reade Seligmann and David Evans -- remain free under $100,000 bonds as they await a trial that is expected to occur next year. Each maintains he is innocent.

Neither they nor their families could be reached Tuesday for possible comment about the CBS show, and their attorneys had no comment.

Defense lawyers apparently will not appear on the television program. Neither will District Attorney Mike Nifong, who has been widely criticized for allegedly rushing to judgment in the case and making inflammatory public statements before he had sufficient evidence.

For the past four months, Nifong has not discussed the situation publicly. He was out of town on business and unreachable for comment Tuesday.

Benjamin Himan and Mark Gottlieb, police investigators in the lacrosse case, also could not be reached. But sources said the two had not been interviewed by "60 Minutes" as of Friday.

The Police Department repeatedly has declined to discuss the lacrosse incident.

It could not be determined Tuesday if a one-time driver for the alleged rape victim, Jarriel Lanier Johnson, was among those Bradley contacted.

"I have nothing to say about it," Johnson told The Herald-Sun by telephone before hanging up.

But Johnson gave police an April 6 handwritten statement about an "appointment," "a job" and a performance the accuser had at three different hotels in two days not long before the alleged rape.

Johnson also said she had sexual intercourse with him during the same time period.

URL for this article: http://www.heraldsun.com/durham/4-777449.html


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; durham; lacrosse; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 801-814 next last
To: ltc8k6; abb; Alia; AntiGuv; AmishDude; BerniesFriend; Bogeygolfer; BossLady; Brytani; ...
DukeLax Ping!!!
21 posted on 10/11/2006 6:31:36 AM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
So, Nifong stands to lose 30 grand of his own money if he is not elected? Now there is a motive!

Excellent article, one of the best in a while. Very high on the recommend list of required reading for this case.

22 posted on 10/11/2006 6:32:09 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; abb

Bumpo!


23 posted on 10/11/2006 6:33:12 AM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath
At one point the Durham H-S reported, according to Defense lawyers, that it was the two strippers who first started calling racial slurs

Do you happen to have a link? I remember reading the quote, something about "you LD white boys gotta pay for it" or something to that effect. I'd love to add a link to the quote to my timeline next to the "slap" reference in Ekstrand's statement.

24 posted on 10/11/2006 6:36:30 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill
If they were "rushing out of the house yelling n....r" in a so called predominantly or highly black integrated neighborhood where they lived

I don't think that's an integrated neighborhood where they lived, is it?

25 posted on 10/11/2006 6:36:30 AM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: abb
Their attorneys must be out of their minds to allow this to happen. By the time Bradley and the rest of the crew at 60 Minutes are finished slicing and dicing the tape, these three will have convicted themselves before they even step into court. Guess they figured Nifong needs all the help he can get.
26 posted on 10/11/2006 6:41:05 AM PDT by CFC__VRWC (AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - Don't liberals just kill ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill
Never mind LB, I found a copy....

National Journal: An Outrageous Rush to Judgement by Stuart Taylor

27 posted on 10/11/2006 6:48:07 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I don't think that's an integrated neighborhood where they lived, is it?

I read an article in the last couple weeks that said "the house was in a predominantly black neighborhood that bordered the walled campus of Duke" or some such.. I'd really be pressed to find it again...

I was just repeating what I had read. I don't know it for a fact...

28 posted on 10/11/2006 6:50:38 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I don't think that's an integrated neighborhood where they lived, is it?

I found it, it wasn't this article but it was a blogger talking about this article somewhere. They called it Walltown

29 posted on 10/11/2006 6:54:25 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

We'll have to break down and watch this segment of 60 Minutes. Oh agony.


30 posted on 10/11/2006 7:15:35 AM PDT by onyx (We have two political parties: the American Party and the Anti-American Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: abb

I'll be watching and praying. I've been gearing up for this every evening -- prayer changes things.


31 posted on 10/11/2006 7:32:17 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle

Jez, this is the first thing I thought of too. They can edit it however they want. I don't trust CBS. This makes me really nervous. This will be people's first time hearing Collin and Reade and I just hope it works out okay.

The defense has been very careful so I don't think they would offer them up unless they had some idea of what 60 Minutes' approach was going to be. Would they?

Oh man, I don't know. The only thing I feel sure of is that Kim will put on one hell of a performance.


32 posted on 10/11/2006 7:33:25 AM PDT by SarahUSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC
I'm not sure. I'm certainly no fan of cBS, much less 60 Minutes. But these boys have very good attorneys. And when people heard Dave Evans was going to speak in public a lot of them thought it would be a huge mistake. I think it was anything but.

Of course they may attempt to spin it, afterall it is cBS, but maybe not. We won't know until we see it. But I'm hoping all the exposure will at least get the trial moved out of Durham if it goes that far. I only hope that it will have enough of an influence on the election to send the Fonger packing.

33 posted on 10/11/2006 7:34:27 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (The true gospel is a call to self-denial. It is not a call to self-fulfillment..John MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SarahUSC

Maybe she will stick her tongue out for the camera. :)


34 posted on 10/11/2006 7:39:01 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (The true gospel is a call to self-denial. It is not a call to self-fulfillment..John MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill
Unfortunately I do not. Your recollection about the substance of the comment is the same as mine. However, there is an exchange between me and the N&O's Melanie Sill on her blog where I berate her for refusing to report this. Her response was that they couldn't properly source it because the H-S attributed it only to "defense lawyers". Sill claimed that using such "anonymous sources" does not meet the N&O's journalistic standards. Yes, yes, very sad.

I don't know if the H-S keeps online archives. If you really want it you might find the date of my exchange with Sill in the N&O's blog archives. I just did a quick search and couldn't find it. It may be one of the posts that "disappeared". I think I may have given a link there or at least that would give you an approximate date for you to do your own search of the H-S archives.
35 posted on 10/11/2006 8:21:40 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill

The neighborhood where the lax house is located is "Trinity Park". Not the same as Walltown.


36 posted on 10/11/2006 8:30:41 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SarahUSC

Great. That's all we need. Another performance by Jabba the Slut.


37 posted on 10/11/2006 8:32:13 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

I've been doing 123nc searches for combinations with her birth date. I found 4 other minor charges, but nothing significant. One interesting thing I found was a charge of communicating threats under the name Crystal Mangum Mcneill in 1998 with a plea of not guilty and a verdict of not guilty 98CR021647. There was also a simple assault charge in 1998 under Crystal Gail Mangum, but the disposition of the charge is unclear. 98CR012751 was the case number.

I could not find anything on any of the case numbers mentioned in that defense motion. They must be under soem other name or something.


38 posted on 10/11/2006 8:33:19 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle

Obviously their lawyers approve of their appearance on 60 minutes. What do the guys have to gain by this?


39 posted on 10/11/2006 8:34:10 AM PDT by toldyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

Yeah Ken_H linked the origingal story on Nifong campaign financing near the bottom of the old thread. Let me under score it. Everyone should read this:

http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.com/2006/10/follow-money.html

If there are to be criminal charges or a tort case against Nifong after this case is done, the follow the money essay will begin the outline of the evidence.


40 posted on 10/11/2006 8:48:59 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 801-814 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson