Replies

We need to get some things straight, n00b. Generally, I do not begin "bashing, insulting, demeaning, or degrading" other ostensible conservatives until they begin themselves. In other words, I do not fire unless fired upon.

So much for my policy on personal attacks. Now, if someone makes a claim that is inherently absurd (for example, the Trans-Texas Corridor will make it easier for the Chinese to invade the United States), then it's weapons-free. Again, in other words, if someone presents a stupid idea I call the idea stupid at once. If you prefer threads or debates that are better moderated, there are plenty of other forums out there. If you feel that I am egregiously violating FR guidelines, then I invite you to click "Abuse" and have my comments removed.

"We need to get some things straight, n00b. Generally, I do not begin "bashing, insulting, demeaning, or degrading" other ostensible conservatives until they begin themselves. In other words, I do not fire unless fired upon."

"So much for my policy on personal attacks. Now, if someone makes a claim that is inherently absurd (for example, the Trans-Texas Corridor will make it easier for the Chinese to invade the United States), then it's weapons-free. Again, in other words, if someone presents a stupid idea I call the idea stupid at once. If you prefer threads or debates that are better moderated, there are plenty of other forums out there. If you feel that I am egregiously violating FR guidelines, then I invite you to click "Abuse" and have my comments removed."

Not like some of your counterparts, I never ride the abuse button, or post to the modes...you buried yourself by being up in the morning and out the job, over and over 7/24 on the same issues. Again, even the Pink Panther could see through you$$$

ANYWAY...
I TOLD YOU I WAS UNCONVINCED WITH YOUR HOLLOW RESPONSIVE EXCUSES, AND BLAH, BLAH...GIVE IT UP CFR LOBBYIST, YOU'RE EXPO$$$ED.

(for example, the Trans-Texas Corridor will make it easier for the Chinese to invade the United States)
I see that you keep bringing this up. Why don't you make a link to the thread where that was brought up so that the context is given consideration? We both know who was involved and what the content and context were.
I'm neither blind nor stupid ya know.

Now, if someone makes a claim that is inherently absurd (for example, the Trans-Texas Corridor will make it easier for the Chinese to invade the United States), then it's weapons-free.

Which definition of "weapons-free" do you mean?

"Fire at will" or "Free of weapons" ??

It'd be much easier for the Chinese to land in force in Mexico and drive their forces up the highway than attempt to attack the continental US immediately.

Despite the whining of liberals, if a foreign country attacked US soil directly, even John Kerry would face political pressure to respond.

But if the attack was "only about Mexico" then the liberal traitors' hue and cry would be "Don't provoke them" and the Chinese could use Mexico or Canada as a staging area.

Nice try on your threat, though.

Cheers!