Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
"Maybe. You can't really prove you were going to do something you never actually did."

They were going to buy a house. Fine. Which one?

Whatever. It's a moot point. An update to the story confirms they were drug dealers. Now the asset forfeiture will be criminal, not civil.

You are so naive, it's embarrassing.

62 posted on 10/17/2006 4:11:24 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
You are so naive, it's embarrassing.

Yeah. I'm so naive I can't figure out that the bureaucrats can get infomation about your financial affairs from your bank on demand that they can't get from your personal records without a warrant. You'd want their money taken even if they were buying a house, because it was cash.

63 posted on 10/17/2006 5:32:53 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
An update to the story confirms they were drug dealers. Now the asset forfeiture will be criminal, not civil.

As I read it, it confirms they are being charged, not convicted, of intending to be drug dealers.

65 posted on 10/17/2006 11:33:51 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson