Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chirac and Iraq

Posted on 09/19/2006 6:01:36 PM PDT by usarmymedic

Jacques Chirac thinks the US needs to lay off Iran. Ease of those crazy ole sanctions, he says. Sanctions only depress people and cause them to have a rotten little day. It's upsetting, apparently.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: chirac; gwot; iran; iraq; islam; muslim; terror
Phooee. I think Chirac is worried about one thing: Arab money or Islamic violence or France being defeated once again. Take your pick. I can't decide.

I guess I'll go with "being defeated yet again" (and yet again by a smaller country). When was the last time France won anything other than a free trial to Lever 2000? Oh, yeah...the Revolution. And that was when one French side had to win AND that side went on to get whooped at Waterloo. The French way is not the successful way, unless you mean to pack on carbs or visit a nude beach.

I think Chirac should lead a new alliance: An Allah-iance, if you will. It should be a new Union. This one would have the unique and rather bold mission to try to overpower the US economically. Or did someone try that already?

Iran, France and Germany could form a pact with each other. They could launch a full-scale peace summit with Green Peace leading the fray. The Swiss would demand neutrality and get rich (and besides, they have cool Army knives). Iran would inevitably be ruined for siding with the French and Germany would turn treacherous and defeat them both (as an aside, I heard that French military schools were recently shut down...yeah, they ran out of white flags to give the freshman class). Then we could rebuild Germany and set up shop there for a few decades and no one would argue about executing their war criminals.

I am not writing from a hateful stance. I am writing from a position of being fed up with the concept of peaceful negotiations with people who wish nothing but Sharia law. It is part of Islamic teaching to be "peaceful" with non-Muslims only until you are able to conquer them. Look it up.

Someone asked me to name the 10 most powerful nations on the planet. I made it to 15 before deciding that I couldn't decide on just 10. I had the US, China, the UK, Japan, Australia, Israel, Canada, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Netherlands, Russia, India, Korea (north or south, tied) and either Pakistan or Iran in the 15 spot (but the rest not necessarily in that order).

Now which of these countries doesn't presently have a problem with Islamic violence?

Japan? It's true that there may only be a small Muslim community in Japan, but Japanese civilians have been killed in bomb blasts, airplane attacks and many other incidents internationally.

Pick again.

Or maybe I've just had too much beer.

1 posted on 09/19/2006 6:01:36 PM PDT by usarmymedic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: usarmymedic

Very good post! You should post more often.


2 posted on 09/19/2006 6:06:31 PM PDT by jdm (I gotta give the Helen Thomas obsession a rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Maybe I need a litte humor in my post. It might get more attention...


3 posted on 09/19/2006 6:21:17 PM PDT by usarmymedic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: usarmymedic
You overlooked the Swiss, who quietly stay under the radar. Not even the Nazis dared to invade Switzerland in WWII.

BTW, well done.

4 posted on 09/19/2006 7:20:54 PM PDT by melt (Someday, they'll wish their Jihad... Jihadn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt

Didn't I mention that for facilitators and financiers, you get a special dispensation?


5 posted on 09/19/2006 8:00:58 PM PDT by usarmymedic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: proudeuro

Nice retort. You're a Sophist, aren't you?


7 posted on 09/20/2006 9:29:14 AM PDT by usarmymedic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: proudeuro
"full of stupid hate to the french..." Nice. Well spoken and well-fashioned response.

And by "retarded" one would think that is such an insensitive term. Should you really use an outmoded and bigoted term to describe something you disagree with?

Shame. Shame. Shame.

Stupid and retarded. How insulting.

Personally, I thought my post was hilarious. It was written partly in humor and partly in response to Chirac's most recent exercise in political folly. That you are humiliated or offended or in any way terrified that people like me are out there is no reason to respond like you did.

As an aside, are you in the military?
9 posted on 09/23/2006 9:23:22 PM PDT by usarmymedic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson