Really nothing new--sorry I posted it. I don't watch court tv so I didn't know what to expect. 2 guests : a woman who was sceptical of the 3 to 33 page, 4 month late, Gottlieb report.
Some crazy guy who claimed the negative date rape drug report was defense spin.
Crier ended the segment encouraging viewers to google the NYTimes piece.
Good report and I view two items you mention interesting:
1. Some crazy guy who claimed the negative date rape drug report was defense spin.
Right you can you spin positive or negative, ie a scientific result? This underlines an important point. Has the defense lied once about any evidence in this case? It is clear NO to me. Has the prosection lied about the evidence in this case? That is a clear YES OVER AND OVER to me. That should tell someone who to believe.
2. Crier ended the segment encouraging viewers to google the NYTimes piece.
Telling people to read a discredited article like that tells me Crier's bias in this matter.
I am glad they mentioned the 3 to 33 pages, but I agree to those of us here, it is well plowed soil.