[JLS]

Good report and I view two items you mention interesting:

1. Some crazy guy who claimed the negative date rape drug report was defense spin.

Right you can you spin positive or negative, ie a scientific result? This underlines an important point. Has the defense lied once about any evidence in this case? It is clear NO to me. Has the prosection lied about the evidence in this case? That is a clear YES OVER AND OVER to me. That should tell someone who to believe.

2. Crier ended the segment encouraging viewers to google the NYTimes piece.

Telling people to read a discredited article like that tells me Crier's bias in this matter.

I am glad they mentioned the 3 to 33 pages, but I agree to those of us here, it is well plowed soil.

[abb]

The wacko koolaid drinker was one of Nifong's CourtHouse Crowd water carriers, John Bourlon. Has a wig of kinky white hair. Wonder if that's where they got the hair sample, lol.

Anyway, he said the FA's drinking was off the table, didn't happen (ROFLMAO). And the issue of her being beat up hadn't been challenged. It's really depressing to see an officer of a court carrying on like he was. He should be committed. And he needs to get a new wig...

The other was a female defense type - very suspicious of the 4 month time lag for Gottlieb to do his notes up. Wants to see the original 3 (2?) pages.

Crier seems to be on our side now. Much more suspicious of Nifong since the last time I saw her on the issue...

I've got it TIVO'd and will watch again, but I think these are the main points.

[Neverforget01]

Exactly---how can a negative rape drug report be "spin"???--The guy looked like he'd been spun in a washing machine..LOL

[jennyd]

As strange as it is, that article does have some useful information. If one can ignore the spin Duff put into it.