Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H

Yeah, they were misleading folks.

The hair test results are devastating to Nifong.

He still has his fingers in his ears, though.


397 posted on 08/31/2006 12:05:08 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies ]


To: ltc8k6
My email to Dr. Shannon Miller of Wright State:

Dear Dr. Miller,

In the August 30, 2006 Herald Sun article entitled "Attorney: Date-rape drug test negative in lacrosse case" by William F West, you were quoted as saying:  

"Negative results, he said, don't necessarily mean no substances were used. That's because some drugs can wash out of the body quickly, he said, also citing the importance of the timing of the test."

However, the test discussed in the article was from a hair sample:

"A date-rape drug test reportedly involving a hair sample of the alleged Duke lacrosse victim has turned up negative, one of the defense attorneys said Wednesday."

http://www.heraldsun.com/durham/4-765602.html

_____________________________________

1. Do drugs wash out of a hair sample quickly?

2. Were you referring to urine tests, rather than hair tests with your comments?

3. Does a negative result on a hair sample tested a month after a supposed ingestion of a date-rape drug mean no substance was used?

401 posted on 08/31/2006 2:45:16 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies ]

To: ltc8k6

Yes, but has anyone seen the toxicology report. Without it aren't we speculating.


476 posted on 09/01/2006 7:11:05 AM PDT by bjc (Check the data!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson