Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H

I just don't know Ken. It's out of my league.

How long do you think it'll be before one of the talking heads says we have to give Nifong the benefit of the doubt. He may have evidence he's holding back - and something convinced that Grand Jury... ?


We should remember that someone from the DA's office or DPD (IIRC, a investigator on the case) told the Durham Herald Sun and activist Victoria Petersen that the Hair involved was a caucasian pubic hair found on the woman's body at Duke during her SANE exam.

It was strange because the Herald-Sun mentioned it once briefly and never again - and no other outlet reported it.

Joe Cheshire was asked about this hair at the DNA press conference and he told them he didn't know what they were talking about. He looked at the other attorneys and said did you read anything about a hair and they shook their heads no. Cheshire said I didn't see anything about a hair.

So, if that hair analysis was really the AV's hair and the DA or Police lied to the Media about non-existent evidence - once again, Durham, we have a problem!

_


320 posted on 08/31/2006 12:20:19 AM PDT by Mike Nifong (Somebody Stop Me !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]


To: All

Here's a Checklist for the FEDERAL INVESTIGATOR:


He said they probably used condoms

He demonstrated that Choke Hold

He said they stole her money and it was left laying right there on the floor - consistent with her story.

He said DNA would Identify the perpetrators and exculpate the innocent.

He read Medical reports that hadn't been compiled or printed.

Affidavits stated the Medical reports documented injuries that are not in the Medical reports.

He said the players didn't cooperate

He said they didn't know who made the first 911 call.

His office said the woman never changed her story.

He ordered a ID lineup that violated every rule on the subject.

He refused to look at exculpatory evidence provided by the player's lawyer.

He made more prejudicial statements than any D.A. in modern history.

He gave Kim a big break and rewarded her with a deal when she stole $ 25,000.00 but went after the Cabbie for driving someone that stole 250 bucks.

He and/or his investigators neglected to tell Judges of major problems with the case in order to garner court approvals. Felonious strangulation and common law robbery were also cited on those documents submitted to the court - and those charges have vanished into the ether.

He pursued a lacrosse player on a noise violation, which a Judge threw out and questioned why the courts were being used in that fashion.

There's no reason to believe the list of attrocities won't grow either.


321 posted on 08/31/2006 12:33:03 AM PDT by Mike Nifong (Somebody Stop Me !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Nifong

But has anyone seen the actual toxicology report?


340 posted on 08/31/2006 3:49:54 AM PDT by bjc (Check the data!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson