There were still some people who believed Tawana Brawley after the truth came out.
Ten years later, nobody does.
People don'tlike to admit errors. I don't expect very many of the AV's most ardent supporters to do 180s and admit anything; most likely they'll still support the AV's right to a decent life (and view her as a poor, wronged working mother), but shift the focus of their blame to the DA for either
1) using them for a false case; or
2) not producing enough evidence.
That way they can keep their self respect and not have to eat crow.
Ten years later, nobody will believe the AV or admit to having supported her.
I expected they would go away. Not say they wrong or not do a 180, but stop posting ever 2 hours.
They don't even have a defensible postion at this point.
But, I hear you.
1) using them for a false case; or
2) not producing enough evidence.
Yes, but here is where the pot-bangers get hoist by their own petard - now they are saying that DAs should strong;y test the veracity of a rape victim before bringing the case?
Just like with BJ Clinton - when their man was found guilty of rape - now we are supposed to throw the "women don't lie about rape" canard out the window.
Can't have it both ways.