It seems from your posts that you simply can't or don't want to imagine the *possibility* that the parents could be involved in a horrendous crime like this. That's understandable and I won't criticize that. What many people (and many here, I think) find when they discuss a horrific crime like this is that discussing the evidence requires entertaining all *possibilities*. That's all we're doing here. To conclude that this consititutes indicting or "pinning" it on any particular person doesn't follow from the premise.
I'll be the first to acknowledge that we don't know who committed this crime and it may well have been JMK or some other intruder. But to ignore any and all evidence implicating the parents would amount to doing the very thing you lament.
IMO, but what's the point of endlessly discussing the parents when it is JMK that is the current focus? I am interested in following the current investigation, not the historical witch hunt on the parents, that culminated in nothing a grand jury would even act on.
The parents as perps angle was exhausted years ago. Currently there is a new suspect and I am not in the least interested in rehashing what has been rehashed a million times before to no purpose.
I'm interested in what information is known about the current suspect and what publicly known evidence fits with this arrest. JMO, but at every turn your posts seem to do nothing but turn back to the parents as perps, ad nauseum.
You seem to be uninterested in the current suspect or any evidence that points to an intruder that the current investigation may be using.
Mr. and Mrs. Ramsey were excluded a long time ago.
You should read a little more Doyle.