Gotcha. And I did know that they had supposedly used the newer technology to get a more complete profile from the foregin DNA that was, I believe, mixed with the tiny blood stains. I am trying to find the article, though, that implied (IMO) that there wasn't an endless supply to be tested again and again...
henry lee doesn't seem to know this either.
whoever said that they have plenty DNA was someone big who worked the case back then... it was Lead Prosecutor or Lead DA or someone like that. That article was posted in the last 2 days on the thread.
My guess is that with new technology that they don't need very much anymore to get a full read on it and that is why this person said they had plenty of the DNA for testing.
It was a 2nd tiny spot in her panties, commingled with her own blood. I would've sworn we heard there were two others mixed with hers, but that may have been a media misunderstanding and then misreported.
If it matches some from under the fingernails, which they say it does, then maybe there is more of it, but my hunch is that if they are saying there is a lot for testing, like to give to Karr's people, it may be because it's PCR or something like that, where they amplify the sample they have by replicating it multiple times - then can use any of the "copies."