Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosiermama

"The Ramsey's have successfully sued numerous media outlets and WON for defamation a character.* Any one who is still in the "the parents did it" camp hasn't gotten all of the facts....and/or has been lead by hearsay,MSM (leaks given big headline and corrections given little or no coverage) and the tabloids."

I agree that much was put out in the MSM that was, by all accounts, defamatory, but I'm not convinced that many details of basic forensics were consistent and didn't need further examination. It may well be that the Ramseys had nothing at all to do with it and that it was entirely the work of an intruder, but there is nothing inappropriate about asking questions about conflicting evidence or forensics.


1,392 posted on 08/23/2006 9:09:18 PM PDT by ableLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1383 | View Replies ]


To: ableLight
about asking questions about conflicting evidence or forensics. Agree, but even today talking heads were saying things that had been refuted or were no longer relavant because of the more current DNA test with more modern accurate results.... Some sounded like they had been reading FR threads instead of looking at the actual facts ;^)
1,403 posted on 08/23/2006 9:25:10 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1392 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson