henry lee claims it is NOT a complete DNA sample. its a partial. I don't know the specifics, but he claims in every interview that all 13 "markers" are not there.
and you believe this? How does Henry Lee know this? - Did the lab in CO send him the report?
I wonder if Lee is speaking from old information from old tests.
I don't believe that Henry lee was part of or working on the case in 2004 when they retested it and got a full DNA profile due to new technology.
Henry Lee may have seen the DNA results from 1997 and 1999, but not the one from late 2004.