just illustrating how ID and creationism are indeed scientific because they are using many scientific observations such as the dna code to point us to a creator. It's only logical, it's only the darkside that's feeding us doubt voices and thoughts about it. But the evidence in us and outside us is plentiful.
Wrong on multiple counts.
To do science, you need to follow the scientific method. This begins with an assumption of naturalism. Now, you may not agree with that assumption for religious reasons, but that is not the problem of science.
Science used data and theory to unravel the mysteries of the natural world. Science follows data wherever it leads, not knowing any final answers.
Religious apologists use their methods to bend or distort scientific data and theories. Science is distorted until it matches revelation, scripture, and/or belief.
ID and creationism are not scientific, although they would have you believe otherwise.
Wow, what a ... scientific argument you make there.