Wrong on multiple counts.
To do science, you need to follow the scientific method. This begins with an assumption of naturalism. Now, you may not agree with that assumption for religious reasons, but that is not the problem of science.
Science used data and theory to unravel the mysteries of the natural world. Science follows data wherever it leads, not knowing any final answers.
Religious apologists use their methods to bend or distort scientific data and theories. Science is distorted until it matches revelation, scripture, and/or belief.
ID and creationism are not scientific, although they would have you believe otherwise.
again, you misrepresent science. A study doesn't always have to do a scientific method as you and others define it. And science by the definition given to us by the dictionary includes much more than naturalism. You are not being honest with your terms or you are just completely blinded by the negative and anti creator voices and thoughts in your head. Why don't you question some of your thoughts?
Neither is evolutionism... because like creationism, evolutionism believes the Earth is the center of the Universe...