[Coyoteman]

While the evolutionists on the thread are correct to refute "guilt-by-association", Nazi policies in the 30's and 40's are a very logical unpacking of Darwinian doctrine consistently applied.

Its "guilt-by-association," but you agree with it.

Anti-evolutionists can't refute "Darwinism" on its own merits, so they have to restort to "guilt-by-association"?

Lets get back to the real issue; how do you refute this?

---

Fossil: Sts 5

Site: Sterkfontein Cave, South Africa (1)

Discovered By: R. Broom & J. Robinson 1947 (1)

Estimated Age of Fossil: 2.5 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, floral & faunal data (1, 4)

Species Name: Australopithecus africanus (1, 2)

Gender: Male (based on CAT scan of wisdom teeth roots) (1, 30) Female (original interpretation) (4)

Cranial Capacity: 485 cc (2, 4)

Information: No tools found in same layer (4)

Interpretation: Erect posture (based on forward facing foramen magnum) (8)

Nickname: Mrs. Ples (1)

See original source for notes:
http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=24

[Lexinom]

A couple of young brothers buried a dead pet cat in their backyard. Years later, when attending a nearby university, they dug up the skeleton. It had fossilized - in just a few years.

The paleontology dept. at that school determined the skeleton's age in the millions of years.

---

I've refuted Darwinism countless times by undermining its requisite presuppositions: one cannot begin without presupposing God because one is then faced with the absurdity of assuming transcendental truth stands on its own. Truths like the Pythagorean Theorem stand on their own. They are, as it were, the great "I AM".

[Elsie]

Lets get back to the real issue; how do you refute this?

Refute what?