Logical fallacy of "argument from adverse consequences". Whether or not Darwin inspired Hitler has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not the scientific theory of evolution is true.
If you really want to go down the argument from adverse consequences route consider this: The words "evolution" and "Darwin" appear absolutely nowhere in Hitler's speeches. On the other hand Hitler made numerous references to "God". When attempting to galvanise the German people Hitler didn't invoke evolution, he invoked their Christian faith, and exploited the long-standing religiously inspired hatred of Jews. By your logic (which I personally don't endorse) we should distrust Christianity, as it is tainted by association with Nazism.
Funny how Darwin is going the way of the Dinosaur?
Evolution, a theory facing imminent collapse every year since 1859. That particular prediction is getting old.
Actually the Aryan bible took the Jews out and replaced them with Aryans. The cross was replaced with a Spear.
The Christian myth was produced by a number of historians fearful of the truth of his mythology and satanic worship being exposed. Fact is he murdered thousands of ministers and priests who were found preaching the gospel.
His connections to evolution and satanic ritual were pretty well written about after the war. Read Mien Kompf and say he is not for weeding Aryan society.
Fewer and fewer are believing Darwin, while more and more are believing Creation. Darwinism is just an atheistic scientific explanation that has man at the top of the food chain. That causes all sorts of moralistic problems. Look at SodomWood, a perfect example of man making the rules. As long as it is PC, anything goes.
Pray for W and Our Troops