Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SarahUSC
Not only couldn't she pick anyone out of the previous line-ups but she said she was only 70% sure Reade was there. Then a few weeks later she ID's him with 100% certainty as one of the attackers.

The literature on false memory is clear: repetition of photos along with suggestion results in false memories. Some people are very vulnerable to false memories.

All the defense has to do to get the "100% certainty" thrown out is to bring in a false memory/false id expert, e.g., Wells or Loftus.

Actually ALL of her testimony about her attackers is tainted by the repetition of the photos.

92 posted on 08/06/2006 9:29:58 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: ladyjane
I think Precious's testimony has a lot more to do with flat out lying than false memories.
95 posted on 08/06/2006 9:43:55 AM PDT by jennyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: ladyjane

The literature on false memory is clear: repetition of photos along with suggestion results in false memories. Some people are very vulnerable to false memories.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

Like people with histories of drug and alcohol abuse. Like people that have been admitted to Psych Wards in the past?


106 posted on 08/06/2006 12:07:24 PM PDT by Mike Nifong (Somebody Stop Me !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson