Wrong again dumbdumb. Coyoteman was distresses at the hoi polloi offering opinions about science on a political website dedicated to conservatives of all stripes. Mucho condescension. And you agreed with him. And now I'm taking you to task over it.
And I won't be discussing boolean logic with you at all until I see some bona fides. And truth be known probably not even after I see your bona fides since the topic bores me to death. Judging by your ineptness at relating the truth however I suspect I won't be hearing them any time soon.
Sorry, not correct. You have not characterized my posts accurately.
I encourage everyone to learn; I spend a lot of time studying, and I think everyone should do so as well.
What I will criticize on these threads are opinions offered with no support, and no study, behind them.
I haven't insulted you, please do not do so with me. FD or FD2003 will do if you don't want to type my full name.
You have only to look at the thread to see what started this whole thing.
If you bristle at the suggestion you should educate yourself, then one has to wonder what other things cause you to get so defensive.
And I won't be discussing boolean logic with you at all until I see some bona fides.
IOW you don't know what I am talking about. You don't know what I mean by 2VL and 3VL, do you? You don't know what an XOR is, do you?
So you really DON'T know boolean logic, do you? So how much else of your CV is fudged?
I'll even give you a head-start 2VL and 3VL stand for 2 Value Logic and 3 Value Logic.
Your move. Or do you want everyone to public see you take back your contention (see how kind I am? I didn't say "assertion") you "know boolean logic?"