Replies

The question and the comment remain. Do you understand TToE well enough to comment on it? Or are you just posing?

I have not made any comments about the Theory of Evolution on this thread. In fact, I do not discount the validity of the Theory of Evolution as a scientific principle. I have not and do not proclaim to be an evolutionary scientist of any kind.

My statement about the infinite Rubik's Cubes was in reference to Hoyle's comment about the chance of obtaining even a single functioning protein by chance combination of amino acids.

And I suppose TToE is a "religion" in the same way as those disciples of Physics and the blind fool Chemists -- and don't get me started on the dogma of Astronomy.

My /sarc tag clearly indicated that I was joking.

Well, there is /sarc and there is /sarc. We get a lot of dripping /sarc from CR/Iders -- many who do in fact post as fact that TToE is blind randomness. So you can see where I drew my enerence from.

I just finished doing battle with some people that really didn't know anything, yet felt qualified to comment. That always bugs me (as you can tell).

And here I promised myself I would take the high road today.

Sorry for the over-sensitive reaction.