Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd

Sorry I missed that. But that same papragraph referenced the sales' manager or some such's acceptance of the deal. Also there are many reasons for a postdated check (paydates and such). The dealership's use of the term implied acceptance of said item as a condition of the sale (in other words they knew about it). Now it may well be that it was meant to be a downpayment (It sounds like that too me).

But the buyer: Still pursuing this, also indicates to me a sense that he felt he was wronged and is not just some guy out for a freebie.

One thing I'd like to know is how long Heard has been in business. Generally speaking long-established businesses don't all of a sudden resort to cheating (absent a change in management or ownership).


44 posted on 07/31/2006 6:11:35 PM PDT by samm1148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: samm1148
I think both parties were out to rip-off each other.

From what I understand the buyer owed $14.7K on a $14K car. So basically there was no trade in. There was no mention of a note, and the only other consideration was a post dated check for $8100.00.

So did this clown really think he was gonna get away with buying a $22K truck for just $8100?

As bad as this is, it looks like the dealer was thinking they were selling a $3000 truck, and getting some fool to pay $8100 for it.

Like I said, both parties were loooking for overkill, but neither one won.

47 posted on 07/31/2006 6:23:54 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson