This is the kind of evolution evolutionists should be passionate about.
Care to translate/interpret this? Was the writer disputing the TOE when he wrote it? I couldn't find anything disputing the TEO in it, so what point were you were trying to make?
I don't understand your question, but my point in making the statement "This is the kind of evolution evolutionists should be passionate about" was that they most evo's seem to be against the notion that God created man and are more intent on finding a naturalistic explanation.